Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3280 (KAR)

SHARANABASAVA S/O AMRUT HAWALDAR v. SMT. PALLAVI D/O VENKATRAMAN PRABHU W/O SHARANABASAVA HAVALDAR

MFA/100752/2022 · 2025-04-25

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6907-DB MFA No. 100752 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100752 OF 2022 (MC-) BETWEEN: SHARANABASAVA, S/O AMRUT HAWALDAR, AGE. 37 YEARS, OCC. PHYSIOTHERAPIST, WRONGLY SHOWN AS MEDICAL SERVICE, R/O. HOUSE NO. 2-907/31A/5 SEDAM ROAD, GUBBI COLONY, KALABURGI 585105. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. GIRIJA S HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PALLAVI, D/O VENKATRAMAN PRABHU, W/O SHARANABASAVA HAVALDAR AGE ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. MEDICAL SERVICE, R/O PADMASHRI, MAHASATI COLONY HERVATTA, TQ. KUMTA , DIST. UTTARAKANNADA – 581343 2. SHOURYA, S/O SHARANABASAVA, AGE 6 YEARS, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER PETITIONER NO. 1 R/O PADMASHRI, MAHASATI COLONY HERVATTA, TQ. KUMTA , DIST. UTTARAKANNADA -581343 …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6907-DB MFA No. 100752 of 2022 ORDER DATED 10.11.2021 PASSED IN M.C. NO.18/2020 BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JDUGE, KUMTA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) This appeal is filed on 08.02.2022. Several opportunities have been provided to the appellant to comply the office objections. 2. By order dated 08.04.2025, two week’s time was granted to comply the office objections, failing which the matter was ordered to be listed on 23.04.2025 for ‘Dismissal’. On 23.04.2025, as the office objections were not complied with, the matter was directed to be listed on 25.04.2025 affording one more opportunity for compliance. 3. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Office objections are not complied with till date in spite of providing several opportunities. It - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6907-DB MFA No. 100752 of 2022 appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 4. The appeal stands dismissed with costs of Rs.5,000/- payable to the High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad, along with costs, if any, imposed earlier. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KMS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1