- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25671 RFA No. 1011 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1011 OF 2016 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. R.CHANDANMAL SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S, SRI. MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN SON OF LATE CHANDANMAL JAIN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO.524, OTC ROAD, AKKIPET CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 053. 2. SHANTHI BAI WIFE OF SRI. LEHAR SINGH.B, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.29, NEW BAMBOO BAZAAR, BANGALORE-560 002. 3. SMT. PUSHPA BAI WIFE OF SRI. PARASMAL GANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.740, 3RD BLOCK, 12TH MAIN, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010. 4. SMT. NIRMALA BAI WIFE OF SRI.PARASMAL JAIN, KOTHARI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, NO.3060, GOLWAR WALL MARKET, RING ROAD, SURAT-395 002. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25671 RFA No. 1011 of 2016 5. SMT. SANGEETHA.Y WIFE OF SRI. GOWTHAMJI GANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.586, 4TH WEST CROSS, ASHOKA ROAD, MYSORE-570 001. 6. SMT. REKHA WIFE OF SRI. SHRAVAN POKARNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO.718/14-3, 41ST CROSS, NEAR ESI HOSPITAL, 3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010. …APPELLANTS [ABSENT] AND: SRI. CHETAN KUMAR SON OF LATE SRI. MAHAVEER KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, RESIDING AT M/S.SIDDARTH JEWELLERS, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, ELLORA MANSION, BANGALORE-560 053. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. H.K.VARADARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.A.WAJID., ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The appeal is listed today for orders and the names of the appellants are printed/ shown in the cause list. The names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25671 RFA No. 1011 of 2016 no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants are absent. Sri.H.K.Varadaraju., counsel on behalf of Sri.S.A.Wajid., for the respondent has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 02.07.2025, on that day, counsel Sri.Satyanand.B.S., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the names of the appellants in the cause list and it was also ordered to be listed on 14.07.2025. Accordingly, the appeal is listed today by printing the names of the appellants in the cause list. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2016. Now we are in the month of July, 2025. The appeal is pending from nine years. As already noted above, the names of the appellants are called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellants have not engaged counsel to represent them in the Court. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25671 RFA No. 1011 of 2016 Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20