Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32792 (CHH)

SMT. RASHMI DEVI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5816/2018 · 2025-07-10

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32389 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5816 of 2018 1 - Smt. Rashmi Devi W/o W/o Late Shri Vinod Sinha Aged About 42 Years (Legal Representative), R/o Behind Post Office, C. A. F. Line, 1st Battaion, Bhilai P. S. Supela, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home/police, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, P. S. And P. O. Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Additional Director General Of Police (A-Dgp), Chhattisgarh, Armed Force (C. A. F.), Police Head Quarter (P. H. Q.) Near Mahanadi Mantralaya, P. S. And P. O. Rakhi, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commondent 1st Battalion, Chhattisgarh Armed Force (C. A. F.), Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/ State : Shri Pramod Shrivastava, Dy.G.A Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11.07.2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- 2. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following reliefs: “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/direction to respondent no. 02 for deciding the petitioner's service appeal expeditiously within time bound, in the interest of justice. 10.2 This, Hon'ble Court may be pleased to provide compensation and cost of the petition to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that the departmental appeal preferred by the petitioner had already been disposed of by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 4.9.2018. 4. Taking into consideration the submission made by counsel for the State, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi