Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14732-2024 Date of decision: 14.05.2025 DALEEP ….PETITIONER(S)
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Rajiv Malhotra, Advocate for Mr. Manan Khetarpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana.
***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal at this stage on account of some technical shortcoming with liberty to file the same afresh with better particulars, in future, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 14.05.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment