HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 23093 of 2018 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shubham Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed by the applicant for quashing the impugned charge sheet dated 21.06.2015 upon which cognizance has been taken against the applicant as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 1779 of 2016 (State Vs. Ved Prakash Sahu and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 97 of 2015, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Nawabad, District Jhansi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the compromise has already been entered between the parties on 17.6.2025 and the same has been verified by the court concerned on 18.8.2025, therefore, the present case be finally decided. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 has not disputed the facts as stated by learned counsel for the applicant. He further contended that opposite party no.2 does not want to proceed with the criminal case against the applicant and the same may be quashed. 5. Learned AGA does not dispute the fact that parties have entered into settlement which is duly verified by the court concerned. It is further submitted that he would have no objection in case criminal proceedings are put to an end. He further submits that in view of settlement there is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ray Sahab Yadav, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Indra Kumar Chaturvedi(Senior Adv.), Shubham Maurya Vijay Kumar Sahu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) virtually no chance of any conviction being recorded in the criminal proceedings. 6. Having examined the matter in its totality, this Court is of the view that the criminal proceedings in the present case had essentially been an outcome of a family dispute and there are no such over bearing circumstances for which the applicant ought to be prosecuted even after the parties has entered into a settlement. Needless to observe that with the present stand of the parties in terms of their settlement, there is practically no chance of recording conviction, even if the case under the F.I.R. in question is put to trial. In other words, entire exercise of trial would only be an exercise in futility. On the contrary, looking to the nature of dispute and the fact that the disputants have compromised and want to proceed peacefully ahead, it would be in the interest of justice that criminal proceedings in question are quashed. 7. It would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceeding or continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that the criminal case is put to an end. 8. In view of the fact that the parties do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them and the fact that matter has been mutually settled between the parties in view of the compromise dated 17.6.2025, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Parbatbhai Aahir Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. 10. The present application is, accordingly, allowed. September 16, 2025 VMA A482 No. 23093 of 2018 2 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHWA MOHAN ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad