Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32777 (AP)

NANUPATHRUNI SHYAM KUMAR v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/9604/2025 · 2025-09-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010485542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9604/2025 Between: 1. NANUPATHRUNI SHYAM KUMAR, S/O SATYANARAYANA (LATE) AGED 40 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE SERVICE R/O.D.NO. 40-481 ,CHINTAL,BAPUNAGAR HYDERABAD, TELANGANA 2. N.SATYAVATHI,, W/O SATYANARAYANA (LATE) AGED 57 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE R/O. SUBBARAOPET, MANDAVALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP 3. HANUMANTHUKNAKA RAJU,, S/O APPALSWAMY(LATE) AGED 61 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O. SUBBARAOPET, MANDAVALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP 4. PAMIDI LEELAVATHI,, W/O KRISHNA RAO AGED 58 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O. SUBBARAOPET, MANDAVALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM II TWON POLICE STATION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP AMARAVATHI. 2. NANUPATRUNI KALYANI, W/O. N SAYAM KUMAR, AGED 35 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O.SUNNAM ENCLAVE APARTMENT BALUSUMUDI, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, AP ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed, by the Petitioners herein, seeking a direction to the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bhimavaram to commence the trail in C.C.No.831 of 2016 forthwith and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. 2 2. Heard Ms.K.Varshitha, learned counsel representing Sri G.Yaswanth, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would submit that the C.C.No.831 of 2016 relating to the offences punishable under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act is pending before the trial Court for the last ten years without any progress. 4. As per the information received from the concerned Court, the delay in disposal of this case is due to missing of original charge sheet in this matter. Therefore, the learned trial Judge is directed to take steps for reconstruction of the charge sheet and proceed with the matter and dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible. The learned trial Judge is further directed to report the progress of the matter to the registry every month. 5. With the above directions, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the presence of the petitioners 2 to 4 herein before the trial Court is dispensed with, unless there is a specific direction by the trial Court for their presence on particular dates. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.9604 of 2025 Dt.17.09.2025 Asr