LAXMI DWELLERS PVT LTD v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/6785/2025 · 2025-04-01
Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32774 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-6785-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-6785-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025
Laxmi Dwellers (P) Ltd.
......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others
.........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR
Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana.
Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate, for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate,
for respondent Nos.2 and 3-HSVP.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the physical possession of the Commercial Booth/building No.1P, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12 and 13 in Sector 24-25A, Urban Estate, Gurugram II, after completion of development works/basic amenities, including road, street light, Sewerage, Parking etc.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to its grievance, the petitioner-company has already AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-6785-2025 (O&M)
-2- made representations dated 18.12.2024 and 05.02.2025 (Annexures P-20 and P-21 respectively) to the competent authority, but no action has been taken thereon till date.
3.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3-HSVP, submits that the said representations shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Estate Officer II, HSVP, Gurugram (competent authority), to look into the pending representations dated 18.12.2024 and 05.02.2025 (Annexures P-20 and P-21 respectively) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 01.04.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.04.04 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document