- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1261 WP No. 23058 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 23058 OF 2018 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: LAKSHMINARAYANA TEMPLE SIDDAPURA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SHANKAR S/O. NARASIMHA SHET, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O. SIDDAPURA VILLAGE & TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581355. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SUMATHI W/O. PRABHAKAR ANVEKAR, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MAGODA, SIDDAPURA TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT-581355. 2. PATTANA PANCHAYATH, SIDDAPURA, TALUKA SIDDAPURA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER-581355. 3. TAHSILDAR, SIDDAPURA TALUK, SIDDAPURA, DISTRICT: UTTARA KANNADA-581355. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT QUASHING NOTICE DATED 26/04/2018 IN NO.PAPAMC ANADHIKRUTHA KATTADA TERAVU VAHI NO.8/2018-19/52 PASSED BY THE CHIEF OFFICER PATTANA PANCHAYATH SIDDAPURA (UK) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1261 WP No. 23058 of 2018 THIS ETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent No.3. 2. Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ quashing notice dated 26/04/2018 in No.PAPAMC ANADHIKRUTHA KATTADA TERAVU VAHI No.8/2018-19/52 passed by the Chief Officer Pattana Panchayath Siddapura (UK) produced at Annexure-A. ii. Issue any other writ or directions to meet the ends of justice. 3. Memo dated 21.01.2025 has been filed signed by the petitioner and the counsel for the petitioner, which reads as under : “The undersigned most respectively submits that in view of settlement between the petitioner and 1st respondent, the aforesaid writ petition does not survive for consideration in view of the above the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition as does not survive of consideration.” 4. Accepting the memo and submission of the counsel, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE CKK CT-MCK