Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32761 (AP)

Thethali Bhavamma v. Dwarampudi Nagayamma

SA/844/2004 · 2025-04-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010486402004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 844/2004 Between: 1. THETHALI BHAVAMMA, W/O. VEERREDDY R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. 2. THETHALI VEERREDDY, S/O. BAPANNA CULTIVATION R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. THETHALI SATYANARAYANA REDDY @ ANNAVARAM,, S/O. VEERREDDY CULTIVATION R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. DWARAMPUDI NAGAYAMMA, W/O. SATYANARAYANA REDDY HOUSEWIFE R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. 2. SATHI NAGA PADMAVATHI, W/O. GANGADHAR REDDY HOUSEWIFE R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. 3. DWARAMPUDI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. VENKAT REDDY CULTIVATION R/O. ANAPARTHY, E.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. M SIVANANDA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.844 OF 2004 J U D G M E N T: None appeared for the appellants. Notice taken to the appellants could not be served for “insufficient address”. 2. The appellants are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 25.04.2025 Pmk 12 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.844 OF 2004 Date:25.04.2025 Pmk