Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010485662013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12444/2013 Between:
1. DUSANAPUDI YEDUKONDALU, S/O CHINNA VENKATARATNAM,
2. PEESAPATI RAJA GOPALACHARYULU,, S/O P.L.NARASIMHA CHARYULU,
3. PEESAPATI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA CHARYULU,, S/O LATE P.V.RAMA CHARYULU. 4. PEESAPATI INDIRA DEVI,, W/O LATE P.V.RANGA CHARYULU
5. S.RAMAKRISHNA,, S/O SOMESWARA RAO
6. M.VENUGOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O NARAYANA MURTHY
7. M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY,, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO
8. CHINTA AYYANNA,, S/O VENKATA SWAMY
9. S.NAGARAJU,, S/O NARASIMHA MURTHY
10. CHINTA SUGUNA,, W/O RAM PRASAD
11. K.SATYAVATHI,, W/O SATYANARAYANA
12. S.LAKSHMI BABY,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO
13. DUSANAPUDI RANI,, W/O YEDUKONDALU ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS, R/O MASTYAPURI, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
2
1. DIST COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI AT ELURU. 2. THE A P STATE IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.STATE IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHASILDAR, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, VEERAVASARAM, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in taking steps to construct a pump house in the site at Sy.No.535/2A and 2B of Mastyapuri Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District which is being used and earmarked as cart-track/pathway/waste water drainage channel as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, besides directing not to proceed further IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 15361 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to make any construction in the site at Sy.No. 535/2A and 2B of Mastyapuri Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District which is being used and earmarked as cart-track/ pathway/ waste water drainage channel, pending final disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3
2. V RAJA MANOHAR (SC FOR APSIDC)
3.
MALLIPUDI DHANA RAJU SC for APIDC Ltd.
4. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV
5. -- The Court made the following ORDER:
Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Dated 10.07.2025 SPP
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 12444 OF 2013
Dated 10.07.2025 SPP