- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1492 RFA No. 1895 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1895 OF 2022 (RES) BETWEEN: R.SEETHALAKSHMI W/O H.L.NAGARAJ, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, SRINIVASA NILAYA, HULIYAR ROAD, HIRIYUR. PRESENTLY R/A DOOR NO.971/5, I FLOOR, 16/A MAIN, 15TH CROSS, A-SECTOR, YALAHANKA NEW TOWN, BANGALORE-560 064. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NAGABHUSHANA.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. H.L.SREENIVAS GUPTA S/O LATE M.LAXMIPATHY SETTY, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, 2. H.S.NAGARAJ S/O H.L.SREENIVAS GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT HULIYAR ROAD, HIRIYUR. 3. H.L.SRIDHARA GUPTA S/O LATE M.LAXMIPATHY SETTY, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1492 RFA No. 1895 of 2022 a) BHARATHI, W/O LATE H.L.SRIDHARA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, b) SREEDEVI D/O LATE H.L.SRIDHARA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, c) R.H.S.CHETHAN S/O LATE H.L.SRIDHARA GUPTA, AGE-MAJOR, ALL ARE R/O GUPTA BUILDING, GANDHI CIRCLE, AT: HIRIYUR. 6. SWARNA W/O LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, 4TH CROSS ROAD, DATTATREYA NAGARA, BSK 3RD STAGE, NEAR VITTALA EYE HOSPITAL, HOSAKERE HALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU. 7. T.A.JANARDHANA S/O LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O 57, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 4TH CROSS ROAD, DATTATREYA NAGARA, BSK 3RD STAGE, NEAR VITTAL EYE HOSPITAL, HOSAKERE HALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH, BENGALURU. 8. T.A.RAMESH S/O LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHA GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.103, I FLOOR, MBM RESIDENCY DOCTORS LAYOUT, CHIKKAKALLASANDRA, SUBRAMANYAPURA, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1492 RFA No. 1895 of 2022 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 15.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6