Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3275 (UTT)

MAHENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/386/2015 · 2025-08-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7052-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/386/2015 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Ishwari Dutt Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for respondent No. 5. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay,J.) Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.08.2025 Mahinder/KSS