- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17220 WP No. 5626 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.5626 OF 2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. UMA MAHESHWARI D/O. MR. VELU, W/O. LATE R. SAMPATH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.8, 'C' STREET, SHANTINAGAR, NANJAPPA CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 027. …PETITIONER [BY SRI R. VEERENDRA SHARMA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. MISS. MANJULA BAI D/O LATE M. RAJU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.242, 3RD CROSS, KASTHURI NAGAR, OPP. MINERVA MILLS QUARTERS, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023. 2. SMT. R. NIRMALA W/O. SRI SURESH KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.62, SULTANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. 3. SMT. R. VIJAYALAKSHMI @ REGINA MARY W/O. SRI ANTHONY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17220 WP No. 5626 of 2020 R/AT NO.3/3, 3RD CROSS (RIGHT SIDE), MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 023. 4. THE DIVISIONAL PERSONAL OFFICER SBC, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, BANGALORE-560 023. 5. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONAL OFFICER SBC, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, BANGALORE-560 023. 6. THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, REPRESENTED BY ITS THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAYS, HUBLI-580 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DINESH GAONKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO R.3; SRI S.V. ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R.4 TO R.6.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE XXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-30) DATED 13.11.2019, REJECTING THE MEMO OF UNDERTAKING DATED 27.09.2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONER AND HAS FURTHER DIRECTED TO FURNISH ANY IMMOVABLE PROPERTY SECURITY OR SUCH SECURITY WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER, ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17220 WP No. 5626 of 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER None appears for the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2020. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25