APHC010485302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 24678/2025 Between: 1. K SURESH BABU, S/O. LATE K.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC MAYOR, KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. R/O. D.NO.37/120, OPP MANASA KALYANAMANDAPAM, KONDAYYAPALLI, KADAPA CITY, YSR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 4. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, , KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 5. SMT MADHAVI REDDAPPAGARI, MLA, KADAPA ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent 2 No.1 in issuing Memo NO.2748808/G/2025, dated 08.09.2025 stating that, the issue for consideration is not about whether the contracts were awarded in competitive bidding through tender process or under my influence, and the show cause notice was issued for violation of Section 22 (1) (h) of GHMC Act, 1995 and to remove me as Mayor in terms of Section 679 (B) (2) and thereby requesting me to peruse the said records on 17.09.2025 at 11.00 Am at his office and further directing me to appear for personal hearing on the same day at 3.00PM, without fail and also clarifying that, no further opportunity shall be granted for raising new grounds or seeking adjournments as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to provide sufficient time enabling me to defend my case by setting aside the Memo No.2748808/G/2025, dated 08.09.2025 issued by him and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings inpursuance of the Memo.No.2748808/G/2025, dated 08.09.2025 issued by the respondent No.1, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard Sri V.R.Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3 3. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date:19.09.2025 ANI 4 683 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION No.24678 of 2025 Date:19.09.2025 ANI