Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32745 (ALL)

MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE CANE SERVICE AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/4227/2025 · 2025-04-06

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:49549 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4227 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Respondent :- State Cane Service Authority And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Kumar Tripathi,Dinesh Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Ravindra Singh Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Heard Shri Dinesh Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Janhvi Singh for the respondents. The only prayer made in the writ petition is to direct the respondent no. 1 to decide the appeal of the petitioner filed against the order dated 18.12.2019 within a stipulated period of time. Shri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to the prayer made by the petitioner. He submits that the appeal may be decided within a stipulated period of time. In wake of the aforesaid submissions and without going into the merits of the case, interest of justice will be served by directing the respondent no. 1 i.e. State Cane Service Authority, U.P. Lucknow through its Secretary/Additional Cane Commissioner (Samiti), U.P. Lucknow to decide the appeal within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 7.4.2025 Vandit Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad