Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32744 (RAJ)

PAWAN KUMAR MEENA S/O SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14140/2024 · 2025-01-03

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:347] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13785/2024 Neeraj Meena S/o Shri Maliram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Samod Road, Village Neemdi, Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural, (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14139/2024 Karan Pareek S/o Shri Matadin Pareek, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Modiyon Ka Mohalla, Morija, Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural. (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14140/2024 Pawan Kumar Meena S/o Shri Surendra Kumar Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Kr/o Meeno Ka Mohalla, Morija, Police Station Samod, District Jaipur Rural, (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 03/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR [2025:RJ-JP:347] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13785/2024] No.840/2024 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the alleged quantity of 203 gram 04 miligram smack recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioners, is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court. The trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the parties and looking to the fact that the alleged quantity of smack recovered from the possession of the accused-petitioners is below commercial quantity and the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: (1) Neeraj Meena S/o Shri Maliram, (2) Karan Pareek S/o Shri Matadin Pareek, & (3) Pawan Kumar Meena S/o Shri [2025:RJ-JP:347] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13785/2024] Surendra Kumar Meena, in connection with FIR No.840/2024 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -32-34