1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10777 of 2025 Decided on: 09.07.2026 Gram Panchayat Bakhalag Development Block, Kunihar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others ..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ishneet Rattan, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh K. Vashisht, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 5. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.6. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Alleging encroachment by respondent No.6, petitioner had instituted this writ petition seeking directions to respondents No. 2-5 to take suitable action in the matter. Respondents No. 1-5 have filed reply denying allegations of encroachment against the respondent No.6. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is under instructions to withdraw the 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 writ petition as matter stands compromised between the parties. 3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 09, 2026 Judge yogesh