- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14942 WP No. 25196 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 25196 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: MR. S. RAVI SHANKAR S/O SHASHIDHAR RAO OCC: BUSINESS AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS NO.79, 80, 3RD CROSS SUNDARANAGAR GOKULA BENGALURU - 560 054 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA P. BANAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDITONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO.434, 4TH FLOOR, GATE - 3, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N R SQUARE, BENGALURU - 560 002. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE 18TH CROSS, IDEAL HOME LAYOUT, NEAR BESCOM OFFICE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 098. Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14942 WP No. 25196 of 2024 4. MR. G M SURYANARAYAN NO. 69, 2ND CROSS, SUNDARANAGARA GOKULA, BENGALURU - 560 054. 5. MR. MARIAN L.M PROPRIETOR OF M/s ACK CORP P001, ACK OLIVES, 3RD B CROSS, BALAJI LAYOUT, OMBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 SRI. N.R. JAGADEESHWARA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3 SRI. H.S. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTING THE SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 21.06.2024, 06.07.2024 AND 11.07.2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURES E, F AND G RESPECTIVELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW EXPEDITIOUSLY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER 1. Memo for withdrawal reads as hereunder: "The Petitioner humbly prays that the Writ Petition may be disposed of as the fourth and fifth respondents have submitted undertaking that they - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14942 WP No. 25196 of 2024 would comply with the prevailing laws and plans regarding the construction as per their letter dated 04.03.2025 which is annexed herewith. Wherefore, the Petitioner prays this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose the petition as 'withdrawn' with a liberty to approach this Hon'ble Court in case of future violations by the respondents." 2. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Needless to state the petitioner is reserved with liberty in the event undertaking of the respondents is not adhered to. Even otherwise the jurisdiction of the respondent - BBMP to exercise its statutory duties will not be obstructed by disposal of the present petition. 4. Accordingly, petition is disposed off. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41