IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19854 of 2025 Decided on: 16.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neelam Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Shailja Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the Respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Ayurvedic Pharmacy Officer in Ayurvedic Health Centre, Lapshak, District Lahul & Spiti. Her case is that on completion of requisite tenure in the aforesaid hard and tribal area, a representation was preferred on 08.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.3 for transfer to soft area of her preference. The grievance of the petitioner is that aforesaid representation has not been considered as yet 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 by the Competent Authority. 3. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 08.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy, within a period of three weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 16, 2025 Judge yogesh