APHCOI 0484432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRADESH .. FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable dr justice WRIT petition mq: 2461? OF VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Between: Ravilisetty Venkata Pavan Bhaskar years, Occ: IT Developer, R/o.9709 USA Rao, S/o.R.V.Ramana Rao Aged 41 ’ Bush Dr.Mckinney, DX, 75072 Street No.6 R/o.Door No.4-12-534, Vanasthalipruam, Hyderabad High Court Colony, Telangana ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department, A.P. Secretariat 2. The Director General of Police, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, 4. The Deputy Superintendent Narasaraopet Palandu District 5. The Station House Palnadu District, AP 6. Smt. Garikapati Chouda Kumari Occ. Housewife, Narasaraopet, Palnadu District Rep. by its Principal Secretary Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. State of Andhra Pradesh Home Mangalagiri Palanadu District, Narasaraopet of Police, Sattenapalli, in-charge of . AP Officer, l-Town Police AP Station, Narasaraopet W/o.Garikapati Ramana Rao R/o.Ajantha Apartment, Andhra Pradesh. aged 60 Prakashnagar years ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution circumstances stated i of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order direction more particularly one the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the the petitioner to settle matrimonial disputes - implicate him in further false respondents 3 to 5 in coercing with his wife, threatening to preventing him from visiting Hon’ble Curt at the instance of the I violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of cases and Narasaraopet to collect passport from the 6th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with his personal life and liberty and Narasaraopet to collect his pormit him to attend the court at passport without any threat or coercion if necessary by providing security. jA NO: 1 OF 207*; Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition direct the 2"^^ , the High Court may be pleased to respondent to provide adequate security to the officers other than the petitioner with any police Narasaraopet and collect police of Narasaraopet to go to . passport from the Hon'ble Court at Narasaraopet pending disposal of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. CHIDAMBARAM, Sr. counsel for SRI YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6:— The Court made the following order: % ^ 1 APHC010484432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 0?to FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24612 OF 2025 Between: 1. RAVILISETTY VENKATA PAVAN BHASKAR RAO, S/o.R.V.Ramana Rao Aged 41 years, Occ. IT Developer, R/o.9709, George Bush Dr.Mckinney, DX, 75072 USA R/o.Door No.4-12-534, Street No.6 High Court Colony, Vanasthalipruam, Hyderabad, Telangana ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep.by its Principal Secretary Home Department, A.P. Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Palanadu District, Narasaraopet, AP 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli Narasaraopet Palandu District, AP in-charge of 5. The Station House Officer, l-Town Police Station, Narasaraopet Palnadu District, AP # 2 6. Smt Garikapati Chouda Kumari, W/o.Garikapati Ramana Rao, aged 60 years Occ. Housewife, R/o.Ajantha Apartment, Prakashnagar Narasaraopet, Palnadu District Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order direction more particularly one the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents3 to 5 in coercing the petitioner to settle matrimonial disputes with his wife, threatening to implicate him in further false cases and preventing him from visiting Narasaraopet to collect passport from the Honble Curt at the instance of the 6th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with his personal life and liberty and permit him to attend the court at Narasaraopet to collect his passport without any threat or coercion if necessary by providing security and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to provide adequate security to the petitioner with any police officers other than the police of Narasaraopet to go to Narasaraopet and collect passport from the Hon’ble Court at Narasaraopet pending disposal of this writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: YASWANTH GADE Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: V ■ 3 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24612 0F 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: . .pleased to issue a writ, order direction more particularly one the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in coercing the petitioner to settle matrimonial disputes with his wife, threatening to implicate him in further false cases and preventing him from visiting Narasaraopet to collect passport from the Honble Court at the instance of the 6th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and conseguently direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to interfere with his personal life and liberty and permit him to attend the court at Narasaraopet to collect his passport without any threat or coercion if necessary by providing security and pass...” 2. Heard Sri K.Chidamabaram, learned Senior counsel assisted by learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned Senior counsel would submit that the petitioner is facing matrimonial disputes with his wife and that there is threat of being implicated in further false cases. It is further submitted that the petitioner is being prevented from visiting Narasaraopet to collect his passport from the Hon’ble Court. 3. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that this Court may pass appropriate orders. In the said circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to appoint Sri Billac Ahmed Syed, learned counsel, and Sri K.V.M. Chiranjeevi, learned counsel, as Advocate Commissioners to accompany the petitioner to the 5. t . a ^ 4 Court concerned at Narasaraopet and to facilitate collection of the passport, also directed to extend necessary protection, that the petitioner is able to attend The respondent-police are prevent any untoward incident, and ensure to his cause. fixed at Rs.25,000/- The fees of the Advocate Commissioners are each, which shall be paid by the petitioner before proceeding to Narasaraopet Court. Petitioner is further directed to make necessary transport facilities to the Advocate Commissioners. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stands Sd/- SHAIK WIOHD. RAFl assistant registrar As a sequel thereto closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, of Andhra Pradesh, 1 The Principal Secretary, Home Department, 2. The Director Guntur District. Superintendent of Police, Palanadu Deputy Superintendent Narasaraopet Palandu District, AP 5 The Station House District, Narasaraopet, AP Sattenapalli, in-charge of 3. The 4. The of Police Police Station, Narasaraopet Officer, l-Town Palnadu District, AP Yaswanth Gade. Advocate [OPUC) 6. One CC to Sri 7. Two CCS to 8. Two CD Copies. of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] GP for Home, High Court ssb HIGH COURT DATED: 12/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 24612 OF 2025 i 15 SEP 2025 ^ L Current Section DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS