[2025:RJ-JP:2107] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 695/2025 Tarun Goel S/o Pradeep Goel, R/o 3273 Lal Darwaza Sitaram Bazaar, Delhi. (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khalia for Mr. Deshraj Kalwania For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.530/2023 registered at Police Station Vishwakarma, District Jaipur City (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is submitted that petitioner has himself surrendered before learned trial court on 04.01.2025. Learned counsel contends that other co- accused persons have been granted bail by this Court. It is contended that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is further contended that petitioner has no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since his date of arrest. Trial will take time in its [2025:RJ-JP:2107] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-695/2025] conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; other co-accused persons have been given benefit of bail by this Court; petitioner has no criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Tarun Goel S/o Pradeep Goel, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /462