IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.697 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.10.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Kuldeep Chand ……...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copies of Pension Payment Orders dated 06.10.2025, which are taken on record, Mr. Rangil Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.4, states that pursuant to mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, petitioner has been authorized pension as well as revised gratuity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, to whom copies of afore communications have been made available, fairly acknowledges factum with regard to compliance. 2 3. In view of the above, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious, as such, present petition is disposed of. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. October 07, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge