APHC010484082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25398/2024 Between: 1. KROVVIDI LALITHA NAGAJYOTHI @ KAMALA NAGAJYOTHI, D/O LATE SARABHARAJU, AGED 39 YEARS, R/O KROWIDIVARI SREET, SARIPALLE, GANAPAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 2. KROVVIDI KRISHNA BRAHMAM, S/O LATE SARABHARAJU, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, BEING LUNATIC, REP. BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER SMT. UMA DEVI W/O LATE SARABHARAJU, AGED 61 YEARS, R/O GANAPAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE LOK ADALAT AT TIRUVURU CONSTITUTED BY MANDAL LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BY MANDAL LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. 2. KROVVIDI ADILAKSHMI, W/O VENKATA KRISHNA BRAHMAM AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O NEAR SOMESWASRA SWAMY TEMPLE, GUNUPUDI, BHIMAVARAM, W.G.DISTRICT. 3. SRI ANNAPOORNA THEATRE DELUXE, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A.SRINIVAS, D.NO. 35-1-36, MANGALAVARPUPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.25398 of 2024 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein in collusion with each and not complying with the Lok Adalat Award passed by the 1st respondent bearing Lokd Adalat Case No. 541/2017 dt. 11-2-2017 arise out of O.S.No. 67/2012 on the file of the V Addl. District Judge, Rajahmundry, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the same by permitting the petitioners to take steps to restore the suit and defend the same as per the Procedure, and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to pass orders directing the Respondent Nos. 3 herein not to create any third party charge over the suit property i.e., site bearing D.No. 17/180, 17/181 presently 35-1-38, 17th ward known as M/s Annapoorna Theatre (Deluxe), within the Rajahmundry Municipal Corporation limits, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SYED GHOUSE BASHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO 2. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY 3 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.25398 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date:11.08.2025 KPV 4 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.25398 of 2024 80 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No:25398 of 2024 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 11.08.2025 KPV