106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-38406-2025 DECIDED ON: 26.02.2026 RAMESH CHANDER VERMA .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH. Present: Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Kanwar Sanjiv Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Narender Pal Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent Nos.2 and 3. SANJAY VASHISTH , J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner, for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Nos.2 and 3, vide order dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Vacation Judge, Karnal, in case, FIR No.359 dated 17.06.2025, under Sections 120-B/406/420/467/468/471 of IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 32-33, Karnal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to challenge the sustainability of the impugned anticipatory bail order dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure P-7), by filing an appropriate petition under the relevant LAVISHA 2026.02.26 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh CRM-M-38406-2025 -2- provision of law, and by placing on record the necessary instances/documents in support of his plea. 3. In view of the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as sought and recorded here above. 4. It is, however, clarified that in case, a fresh petition is filed by the petitioner, within a period of four weeks from today, the question of limitation shall not operate as a bar. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 26.02.2026 JUDGE Lavisha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No LAVISHA 2026.02.26 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC, Chandigarh