HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10175 of 2022 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State, Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners. 3. Upon the said final report, notices were issued to respondent no.4 and consequent thereto, respondent no.4 has filed a Protest Petition, which is pending disposal before the competent court and as such, present writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view thereof, since the investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners, the instant writ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Prakash Pandey, Kuldeep Kumar Dixit, Lalit Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Mishra Manendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petition has become infructuous. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been infructuous. September 19, 2025 Nadim CRLP No. 10175 of 2022 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad