IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos. 17058 & 17064/2025 Decided on: 03.11.2025 1. CWP No. 17058/2025 Sarita Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No. 17064/2025 Raj Pal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners: Ms. Anuja Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 applicability of Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these instant writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Sanjay Kumar2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 03rd November, 2025(rohit) 2CWPOA No.5536 of 2020 a/w connected matters decided on 01.11.2023