1 2025:CGHC:36308 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7362 of 2025 1 - Smt. Chandrakala Gavel W/o Shri Rajesh Gavel, Aged About 44 Years Working As Assistant Teacher, (L.B.) In Government Primary School Bargarh, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, R/o House No. 200 A, Chandan Nagri, Botalda, Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, School Education Department, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Cum President, Of The District Rationalization Committee, For Rationalization District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Cum Member, Secretary Of The District Rationalization Committee Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Eduction Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Principal / Head Master, Government Primary School Bargarh, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Principal / Head Master, Government Primary School Kansabahar, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.25 19:06:08 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sajal Kumar Gupta, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25/07/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P/1) and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner, who is an Assistant Teacher (LB), has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred from Bargad, Block Kharsia to Kansabahar, Block Dharamjaigarh under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had moved a representation before the authorities concerned, but the same has been rejected by the authorities mechanically and in non-objective manner on 20.06.2025 (Annexure P/4), therefore, she has approached to this Court for redressal of her grievances. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved