Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32680 (AP)

R VIJAYA LAKSHMI v. SRI MUKESH KUMAR

CC/4387/2024 · 2025-07-16

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010484432024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4387/2024 Between: 1. R VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O GOPINATH RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 3 -264 RAJAMPALLI CHANDRASHEKARA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MUKESH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AP SECRETARIAT , VELAGAPUDI , AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR 2. SMT A THAMEEM ANSARIYA I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 3. R GOPALA KRISHNA I A S, JOINT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. SRI G KESHAVARDHAN REDDY, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KONADABOINAPALLI PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 5. SRI P MANJUNATH REDDY, TAHSIIDAR OF CHANDRASHEKARA MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent authorities by invoking the provisions of the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of court Act, 1971 by 2 taking appropriate steps as per the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 in accordance with law, for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 22-01-2024 n W.P. No. 1509 OF 2024 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. REGULAGADDA VENKATESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. J DILEEP KUMAR 2. 3 The Court made the following order: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 22.01.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1509 of 2024. 2. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also, i.e., on 26.12.2024, 05.02.2024, 06.03.2025 and 10.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Sri J.Dileep Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.5, submits that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 22.01.2024 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1509 of 2024, hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case. 3. Recording the submission of learned counsel for respondent No.5, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17.07.2025 MP 4 206 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO:4387 of 2024 Date: 17.07.2025 MP