STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY v. ISRAR HUSAIN
SPA/647/2018 · 2025-07-14
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3268 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3268 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
SPA No.647 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State/appellants.
2. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned counsel for the respondent.
3. Respondent filed Writ Petition (S/S) No.535 of 2018 challenging his transfer from Nyay Panchayat to Gram Panchayat by contending that as a Gram Panchayat Adhikari, he is not liable to be transferred from Nyay Panchayat to Gram Panchayat.
4. The writ petition was allowed by learned Single Judge by judgment dated 23.03.2018. Challenging the said judgment, State has filed this appeal.
5. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned counsel makes a statement at Bar that writ-petitioner (respondent herein) has retired from service in 2022. Thus, he submits that after his retirement the reliefs as claimed in writ petition do not survive.
6. Learned State Counsel also submits that appeal has become infructuous in view of superannuation of appellant.
7. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(Subhash Upadhyay,J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.07.2025 SS