ADDA VISWA JAGADEESH v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/9822/2025 · 2025-09-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32675 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32675 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010485342025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.2 & 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9822/2025 Between:
1. ADDA VISWA JAGADEESH, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 25 YEARS, R/O TENUKULU, BANK COLONY, BHIMAVARAM. (A1)
2. YANDRAPU JAYA PRAKASH, , S/O SRINIVAS RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O SRUGAWRUKSHAM VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. (A2)
3. YANDRAPU BABI SHALINI,, W/O JAYA PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O SRUGAWRUKSHAM VILLAGE PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. POTHRAJU YESOBURAJU,, S/O RAJU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O SRUNGAVRUKSHAM VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI. 2. ADDA SANTOSHI KUMARI, D/O THOTA SEETHARAMULU, R/O KOMMUGUDEM VILLAGE, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. VARADAM SAI LIKHITH
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2
The Court made the following:
COMMON ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 4, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.773 of 2023 on the file of the Court of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadepalligudem for the offences under Sections 447, 323, 354-A and 506 read with 34 IPC. 2. I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are filed by Respondent No.2/De facto complainant seeking permission to compound the offences and compromise the matter with the Petitioners. 3. Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 4 and Respondent No.2 appeared before this Court and were identified by their respective learned counsel. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance. 5. Both parties would submit that they came to an amicable settlement and filed a joint memo to that effect for withdrawal of the present case pending between them.
Respondent No.2 by way of an affidavit would submit that, at the intervention of well-wishers and family elders of both sides, the matter was settled between the parties out of the Court and in view of the same, she intends to compound the offences alleged against the Petitioners and compromise the matter with them, in the present case and prays for quashment of the case. 3
6. Considering the submissions, in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, and in the interest of justice, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the case against the Petitioners / Accused Nos.1 to 4 in C.C.No.773 of 2023 on the file of the Court of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadepalligudem, is hereby quashed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:19.09.2025 Dinesh
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.9822 /2025
Dt.19.09.2025
Dinesh