Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:38038
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No.1680 of 2018
1.Md. Akhtar, aged about 70 years s/o late Subhan Khalifa, 2.Jamila Khatoon, aged about 65 years, wife of Md. Akhtar Both resident of village - Bhadodih, P.O. +P.S-Telaiya ward No. 17, District Koderma
… Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Md. Shamim Alam @ Lattu, s/o Md. Akhtar
3. Md. Naimuddin, s/o Md. Akhtar
4. Md. Kalimuddin s/o Md. Akhtar
5. Md. Naushad Akhtar, s/o Md. Akhtar
6. Md. Irsad, s/o Md. Akhtar
7. Md. Irfan, s/o Md. Akhtar All resident of Bhadedih, P.O. +P.S.-Telaiya ward No. 17, District Koderma
… Opp. Parties
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners: Mr. Manoj Kumar Choubey, Amicus Curiae For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, APP For OP No.3,5,6 & 7 : Ms. Aulia Begum, Advocate ------
13/17.12.2025 Heard the parties.
2. This revision petition has been preferred for setting aside the
judgment dated 27.06.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Koderma in Original Maintenance Case No. 88 of 2017, whereby the petition filed under section 125 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected.
3. Learned Amicus appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are the father and mother of respondents 2 to 7 and now respondent No. 2 to 7 have decided to pay maintenance to father and mother a sum of Rs.2000/- per month. In view of that I.A. No.400 of 2024 has been filed for compromise between the parties. He further submits that in view of compromise, this petition may be disposed of.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for opposite party No. 3, 5, 6 & 7
2025:JHHC:38038
2
submits that the compromise has reached between the parties and opposite parties are ready to pay Rs 2000/- per month as a maintenance to the father and mother respectively and they are regularly paying the same.
5. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the prayer made in the I.A. No.400 of 2024 meant for compromise is allowed.
6. Consequently, this revision is disposed of in terms of the compromise.
7. Pending petition, if any also stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 17.12.2025 R.Kumar