APHC010484242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24866 OF 2025 Between: 1. Kolluri Mary Deenadaya Margaret, W/o Prasad, Hindu, aged about 55 years, Rto D.No.6-8-29, 9th Ward, Hyerpet, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. THE STATE OF AP, rep. by its Principa Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner, Sattenapalli Municipality, Sattenapalli Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent of Police, The Superintendent of Police, palnadu District, Narasaraopet Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA PETITION NO: 24866 OF 2025 1. Kolluri Mary Deenadaya Margaret, W/o Prasad, Hindu, aged about 55 29, 9th Ward, Hyerpet, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati. 2. The Commissioner, Sattenapalli Municipality, Sattenapalli Palnadu District, 3. The Superintendent of Police, The Superintendent of Police, palnadu Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, 5. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu ...Respondents IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 1. Kolluri Mary Deenadaya Margaret, W/o Prasad, Hindu, aged about 55 29, 9th Ward, Hyerpet, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, ...Petitioner l Secretary, Home Department, 2. The Commissioner, Sattenapalli Municipality, Sattenapalli Palnadu District, 3. The Superintendent of Police, The Superintendent of Police, palnadu 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sattenapalli, Palnadu District, 5. The Station House Officer, Sattenapalli Town Police Station, Palnadu ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring the action of the respondent 5 as illegal. arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Direct respondent 5 (SHO) not to interfere in this civil dispute and restrain the respondent No.5 threatening to file false criminal cases in collusion with unknown persons and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent No.5 to not to interfere in the petitioner schedule property i.e., Door No.6-5-63, to an extent of 177.77 sq. yds., Sattenapalli Town, Palnadu District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKATESH KOSARAJU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24866 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “....pleased to Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, declaring the action of the respondent 5 as illegal. arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Direct respondent 5 (SHO) not to interfere in this civil dispute and restrain the respondent No.5 threatening to file false criminal cases in collusion with unknown persons and pass...” 2. Heard Sri Kosaraju Venkatesh, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on behalf the respondents. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, by way of written instructions dated 15.09.2025, it is submitted that a complaint was lodged by one Chilaka Soubhagyam against the petitioner and her husband, which was registered as Crime No.260/2025 of Sattenapalli Town Police Station, under relevant provisions of BNS, and investigation is in progress. It is stated that the petitioner was called only for the purpose of serving notice under Section 35(3) BNSS and there is no interference in civil disputes as alleged in the present writ petition. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the matter before appropriate forum. 4 5. Considering the submissions of both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies before the competent Court regarding the case registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stands closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 KKV 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.24866 of 2025 Dt.16.09.2025 KKV