[2025:RJ-JP:3791] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13829/2024 1. Lumb Singh S/o Hada Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ramkheda Dhannar, P.s. Jawaja, District Beawar. 2. Kalyan Singh S/o Lamb Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ramkheda Dhannar, P.s. Jawaja, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged In District- Jail, Beawar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13830/2024 Praveen Singh S/o Bheem Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ramkheda Dhannar, Police Station Jawaja, District Beawar. ( At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 27/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.385/2024 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. Investigation is [2025:RJ-JP:3791] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13829/2024] being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submit that petitioner Lumb Singh is bona fide purchaser and now, the seller has died. Counsel submit that petitioner Praveen Singh is a witness of the sale deed. Counsel submit that entire offence is based on document which have already been recovered by the investigation agency. Counsel submit that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Lumb Singh S/o Hada Singh, (2) Kalyan Singh S/o Lamb Singh & (3) Praveen Singh S/o Bheem Singh shall be released on bail provided each [2025:RJ-JP:3791] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13829/2024] of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail. 8. If any breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /115-116