2025:JHHC:38113 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7216 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7216 of 2025 ---- 1. Md. Amjad, aged about 48 years, S/o Md. Hafiz 2. Md. Sikandar, aged about 52 years, S/o Hafijur @ Baccha 3. Md. Naeem @ A. Naim, aged about 42 years, S/o Abdul Karim @ Dolo 4. Md. Saddam Ali @ Lala @ Md. Saddam, aged about 32 years, S/o Md. Shikander 5. Md. Afzal Ali @ Afzal, aged about 30 years, S/o Md. Shikander 6. Md. Akhtar @ Akhtar Hussain @ Chiku, aged about 55 years, S/o Hafijur @ Baccha All are R/o Makdampur, Road No.2, PO and PS – Parsudih, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Achinto Sen, Advocate For the Informant :- Md. Nasim Akhtar, Advocate ---- 02/18.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.140 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 121, 122, 126(2), 127(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109(1), 329(3), 352 and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 2025:JHHC:38113 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7216 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners of assault and false case has been lodged against the petitioners. He further submits that the allegation of assault on head is there against one Md. Javed Ali. He then submits that the allegation of assault on leg is there against petitioner No.2 namely Md. Sikandar. He next submits that so far rest of the petitioners is concerned there are general and omnibus allegation. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioners of assault and even the informant has received the grievous injury. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that the allegation of assault on head is there against one Md. Javed Ali, who is not the petitioner in the present case and further allegation of assault on leg is there against petitioner No.2 namely Md. Sikandar and in that view of the matter I am not inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.2 namely Md. Sikandar. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner No.2 namely Md. Sikandar is hereby rejected. 6. So far petitioner Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegation against them and in view of that 2025:JHHC:38113 --3-- A.B.A. No. 7216 of 2025 I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 namely Md. Amjad, Md. Naeem @ A Naim, Md. Saddam Ali @ Lala @ Md. Saddam, Md. Afzal Ali @ Afzal and Md. Akhtar @ Akhtar Hussain @ Chiku respectively. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioner Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.140 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 18.12.2025 Sangam/