Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3267 (RAJ)

M/S SHRI GANPATI TUBEWELL COMPANY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SAW/69/2024 · 2025-07-03

Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24534-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 69/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7733/2022 M/s Shri Ganpati Tubewell Company, Through Proprietor Mahesh Kumar Mittal, Near New Bus Stand, Shahpura, Jaipur - 303103 (Raj.). ----Appellant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Additional Chief Secretary, Public Health Engineering and Ground Water Department, Government of Rajasthan, 5105, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005. 2. Additional Chief Engineer, PHED, Region-II, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Gagan Sharma Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Rahar Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 03/07/2025 1. Heard on Application No. 56/2025 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. 2. Taking into consideration the cause shown in the application as also short period of delay, the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is allowed and delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. 3. Heard. [2025:RJ-JP:24534-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-69/2024] 4. Though number of grounds have been urged, taking into consideration that the impugned order is outcome of consent between the parties, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. 5. Appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to file review petition. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ MANOJ NARWANI-GARIMA /110