Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32667 (AP)

B.CHIRANJEEVA RAO, v. A.P.S.R.T.C.,

WP/25972/2002 · 2025-08-27

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010482712002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25972/2002 Between: 1. B.CHIRANJEEVA RAO,, S/O KRISHNA JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.351157 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 2. LUBENA BEGUM, W/O JULALUDDIN FAROCUI JUNIOR ASST. (F), E.51063 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 3. SURAPANENI JANIKAMBA, W/O RAMA RAO JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.99077 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 4. T.L. MOHAN RAO, S/O SURYAPRAKASA RAO JUNIOR ASST. (P), E.50832 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 5. K. NAGARJUNA RAO, S/O K. ARJUNUDU JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.350695 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 6. B.CH.S. SINGH, S/O LAKSHMAN SINGH JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.113984 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 7. V. CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O V. VENKATA MOHESWARA RAO JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.351157 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 8. P.U.M. RAO, S/O P.B. SASTRY JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.351327 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 9. V. NAGESWARA RAO, S/O PYDIAH JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.350453 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 10. J.G. V. SASTRY, S/O APPA RAO JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.31109 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 11. K.S. MANJULA, S/O K. ROMAIAH SESHADRI JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.354615 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 12. K.A. BHARATHI, D/O K.V. SUBBA REDDY JUNIOR ASST. E.114504 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 13. T.N. K.V.S.R. PRASAD, S/O HARINANDHA BABU RAO JUNIOR ASST. (F) E.105199 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 14. P. RAANJANEYULU, S/O GIRIJAPATHI JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.103240 R/O VIJAYAWADA. 15. CH. VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O NENCHARAIAH JUNIOR ASST. (P) E.82956 R/O VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. A P S R T C, A.P.S.R.T.C., MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., VIJAYAWADA ZONE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the respondents and issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in proceedings No. E2/25(41)/02-Dy. CPM /VZ, dated 20-12-2002 issued by the second Respondent, deploying the petitioner to operation depots as illegal, contrary to law, contrary to circulars issued from time to time in Violation of service Regulations, in violation of Principles of natural justice and also violative of Arts. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently setting-aside the above proceedings, declare that the petitioners are not excess staff IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 32803 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioners herein to dishcharge their duties as Junior Assistants (F & P) in their respective places by suspending the operation of the order issued by the second Respondent in proceedings No.E2/255(41)/02-Dy.CPM/Vz, dated 20-12-2002, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 3327 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt 2-1-03 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.32803 of 2002 in W.P.No.25972 of 2002 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P DURGA PRASAD SC FOR APSRTC 2. . The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025 and 31.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 28th August, 2025 RKS