Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32663 (MAD)

K.BALASUBRAMANIYAM v. M/S.T.J.FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY AND INVESTMENTS (P) LTD

CRL OP/7553/2025 · 2025-03-14

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 K.Balasubramaniyam ... Petitioner Vs M/s.T.J.Financial Consultancy and Investments (P) Ltd., No.9, K.R.Koil Street, 1st Floor, West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 033. Represented By Its Manager A.S.Kannan ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to delete and set aside the conditional order of the lower appellate court in Para No.7, “further the petitioner shall deposit 15 percentage of the compensation amount to the credit of STC No.10/2022 on the file of the trial court within 60 days passed in CRL.MP.No.21767/2024 in CA.No.561/2024 dated 06.08.2024 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge at Madras. For Petitioner : Mr.T.I.Ramanathan ORDER This petition has been filed to delete and set aside the conditional order of the lower appellate court in Para No.7, “further the petitioner shall https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 deposit 15 percentage of the compensation amount to the credit of STC No.10/2022 on the file of the trial court within 60 days passed in CRL.MP.No.21767/2024 in CA.No.561/2024 dated 06.08.2024 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge at Madras. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials placed on record. 3. The petitioner is an accused in the complaint lodged by the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. After fulfledged trial, the Trial Court had convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced her to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months and also awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.12,00,000/-. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Appellate Court in Crl.M.P.No.21767 of 2024 in C.A.No.561 of 2024 and the Appellate Court, by an order dated 06.08.2024, while suspending the sentence, imposed a condition to deposit 15% of the compensation amount to the credit of Trial Court, within a period of sixty days. The petitioner is unable to pay the said https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 amount awarded by the Trial Court. Hence, this petition. 4. It is seen that the petitioner failed to satisfy this Court to avail the benefit under the exceptional category. 5. Therefore, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the order passed in CRL.MP.No.21767 of 2024 in CA.No.561 of 2024 dated 06.08.2024 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge at Madras. However, the petitioner is at liberty to comply with the condition imposed by the appellate Court on or before 24.03.2025, failing which the Appellate Court is directed to proceed as against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 14.03.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn To 1. The Principal Sessions Judge at Madras. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.7553 of 2025 14.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis