J. Jayaraju v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by The
WP/7753/2014 · 2025-01-23
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32661 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32661 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUA TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7753 OF 2014 Between: J. Jayaraju, S/o J. Prakash Rao Hindu, aged about 41 years Philihousepet, Eastern Street, Eluru- 534001 West Godavari District ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by The Principal Secretary Home Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Director General, Anti Corruption Bureau, Road No.12, MLA Colony, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4. P. Rambabu, S/o.Satyam, Hindu, Aged 56 Years, Working as Asst. Sub-Inspector, Veeravaseram Police Station, Veeravaseram Village and Mandal, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of
writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents 1 to 3, in not conducting investigation/Enquiry, regarding the Complaint Dated: 30-08- * ^ 2013 against the Fourth Respondent, in acquiring disproportionate assets, acts of his illegal gratification using his office as Asst. Sub-Inspector, in spite of several complaints, reminders made by the Petitioner, contrary to Prevention of Corruption Act, is illegal. Contrary to Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, contrary to Provisions of Cr.P.C, and against the principals of natural justice, and consequently to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to conduct the enquiry/investigation on the complaint made by the F’etitioner against the Fourth Respondent and to file report. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014 (WPMP. NO: 9637 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to conduct the enquiry/investigation on the complaint made by the Petitioner Dated: 30-08- 2013 against the Fourth Respondent and to file Report.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B V RAM NARESH KUMAR GP FOR HOME UDAYA BHASKARA RAO (SC FOR ACB SPL PP) The Court made the following:
I t APHC010483002014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7753/2014 Between: J. Jayaraju ...PETITIONER AND The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By The and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S SYAMSUNDER RAO Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR HOME 2.UDAYA BHASKARA RAO(SC FOR ACB SPL PP) 3.B V RAM NARESH KUMAR
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.7753 of 2014 f The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 2'^'^ respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in not conducting the Investigation/Enquiry regarding the complaint dated 30.08.2013 against the 4'^ respondent in acquiring disproportionate assets using his office as Assistant Sub-Inspector, in spite of several complaints and reminders made by the petitioner. 3. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the 2 respondent, upon receipt of the written instructions, submits that the complaint dated 30.08.2013 was addressed and the final report submitted by the 2 Rc.No.27/RE-EWG/2013, dated 29.09.2014. nd was nd St respondent to the 1 respondent vide
4. In view of the same, as no cause survives, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall Sd/- M SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER stand closed. //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. N
2. The Director General, Anti Corruption Bureau, Krishnalanka, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, 520013. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4.
P.Rambabu, S/o.Satyam, Hindu, Aged 56 Years, Working as Asst. Sub- Inspector, Veeravaseram Police Station, Veeravaseram Village and Mandal, West Godavari District. 5. One CC to Sri S Syamsunder Rao Advocate [OPUC]
6. One CC to Sri B V Ram Naresh Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
8. One CC to Sri Udaya Bhaskara Rao (SC for ACB Spl PP) Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies SK
r HIGH COURT DATED: 23/01/2025 ORDER andh^^ I g n FEB 2025 I Current Section WP.No.7753 of 2014 i DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS