o iu< ¥ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE V PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 808 OF 2009 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.12.2008 in W.P.No.18497 of 2002 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, represented by its Managing Director, 5-9-194, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. 2. The Senior Branch Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation, 5-9-194, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. ...Appellants/ Respondents 3&4 AND 1. Dr. Polavarapu Veera Raghava Sarma, S/o.late P.Venkata Subbarao R/o. Kothapet, Guntur. ...Respondent/ Petitioner 2. The District Collector, Guntur. 3. The Special Deputy Tahsildar, of A.P. State Financial, Corporation, Guntur. Respondent/Respondents I.A. NO: 1 OF 2009rWAMP. NO: 1167 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 47 days in filing the writ appeal in exercise of its powers under Sec.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and pass. Counsel for the Appellants: M/s Y N LOHITA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 &3: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 4 APHC010483312009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 808 of 2009 Bench Sr.No:-23 [3483] The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation and others ...Appellants Vs. Dr Polavarapu Veera Raghava Sarma and others ...Respondents ********* Advocate for Appellants Advocate for Respondents Mr. G. R Sudhakar GP for Revenue for R.2 & R.3 CORAM -.THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 21^* January, 2025 THAKUR DATE P C : Mr. G R Sudhakar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, fairly states that similar appeals involving similar issues were dismissed by this Court and that S.L.P preferred against the order of dismissal was also In that view of the matter, he states that dismissed by the Supreme Court, the matter is rendered infructuous. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The District Collector, Guntur. 2. The Special Deputy Tahsildar, Guntur. 3. One CC to M/s. Y N Lohita Advocate of A.P. State Financial, Corporation [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025 ORDER WA.No.808 of 2009 \ 2 9 JAN 2025 ^ . Current ieciion o\ DISPOSING OF THE WA WITHOUT COSTS