Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32651 (ALL)

SARVENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/3608/2025 · 2025-03-23

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42441 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3608 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarvendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order impugned. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for the State raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition at this stage when the order itself provides the petitioner to prefer appeal before the competent authority i.e. respondent no.3-Divisional Commandant, Home Guards, Division Saharanpur, District Saharanpur. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has sought for certain information under the Right to Information Act and also want certain more documents which has not been supplied. 5. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make representation before the concerned authority for supply of the requisite documents like enquiry report etc. In the event any such representation is filed the same may be decided in accordance with law. Order Date :- 24.3.2025 Deepika Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad