SONU YADAV ALIAS SONU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5775/2025 · 2025-12-11
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32645 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32645 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37288 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5775 of 2025
---- 1.Sonu Yadav @ Sonu Kumar, aged about 18 years, son of Sri Mahendra Yadav 2.Dheeraj Yadav, aged about 18 years, son of Sri Umesh Yadav, all resident of Village Karkend Khatal, PO and PS Putki, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner
-- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners
:- Mr. Raj Nandan Chetterjee, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Advocate
---- 5/11.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Putki P.S. Case No. 16/2025, registered offence under sections 127(1) / 117(2) / 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, now pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault. He further submits that although the injury has been received, however, it is not clear, due to whose blow, such injury has been received. He then submits that three coaccused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.6310 of 2025.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the injury has been received by the informant.
5. Looking into the contains of the FIR it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault. It is not clear due to whose blow; such injury has been received and the three of the coaccused persons have been granted anticipatory bail as aforesaid, and in the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad, in connection with Putki P.S. Case No. 16/2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 11.12.2025 SI/