Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32643 (KAR)

SMT. PADMAMMA v. MR. DEVARAJALU. D

MFA/9579/2018 · 2025-06-23

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21680 MFA No. 9579 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 9579 OF 2018 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PADMAMMA , W/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY N.V., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS. 2. VENUGOPAL. N. C. S/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY N.V., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. 3. SRIKANTH N. C. S/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY N.V., AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. 4. SHILPHA. N. C. D/O LATE CHANDRA REDDY N.V., AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDING AT NADUPALLI VILLAGE, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VISHWANATHA K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. DEVARAJALU. D S/O SHANKAR REDDY. D., Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21680 MFA No. 9579 of 2018 MAJOR IN AGE, NO.5/7, 9TH CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD, BRINDAVAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 054. 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., KRUSHI BHAVAN, OFFICE: MAGISTRATE COURT BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.S. MARULAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 27/12/2017, PASSED IN MVC NO.4352/2015, ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XX ACMM., & MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-24), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND DISMISSING THE PETITION AGAINST RESPONDENT NO.2. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21680 MFA No. 9579 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 23.06.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the above appeal. 2. Memo is placed on record, which reads as under: "The appellants prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the appellants to withdraw the appeal since the claimants already filed the appeal in M.F.A.No.3721 of 2018 for claiming compensation/ enhancement. Hence, this memo in the interest of justice and equity". 3. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23 CT: BHK