Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32640 (PNJ)

KAPIL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/13410/2025 · 2025-04-02

H S Grewal

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

215 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-13410-2025 Date of decision: 02.04.2025 KAPIL ...PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Amit Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate for the complainant. **** H.S.GREWAL,J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking the concession of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short – BNSS) in FIR No.2 dated 03.01.2025, under Sections 287, 324(2), 351(2), 3(5) Bhartiya Nayaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 and Section 25(1) (a) of Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Mundkati, District Palwal. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 11.03.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the petition is allowed and the interim order dated 11.03.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 02.04.2025 (H.S.GREWAL) renu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.04.02 04:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document