DAMARUDHAR PATEL v. CHHATTISGARH STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION
WPC/3117/2020 · 2025-07-10
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32640 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 32640 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1-
2025:CGHC:32234
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3117 of 2020 Damarudhar Patel S/o Shri Pyarilal Patel Aged About 40 Years Caste Aghariya, Resident of Village Bhadarpali, Post Toshgaon, Police Station And Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattsgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1- Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through The Chief Information Commissioner, Atal
Nagar,
Mahanadi
Bhawan,
Raipur,
District
Raipur
Chhattisgarh. 2- Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3- Public Information Officer O/o Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Mahasamund , District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4- Public Information Officer O/o Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 5- Secretary (Public Information Officer), Gram Panchayat Gidhali Post Singhanpur, Janpad Panchayat Mahasamund , District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate with Ms. Aftabul Nisha, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Lavkush Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey
Order on Board 11.07.2025 Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE
-2- 1) Mr. Rizvi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though Janpad Panchayat Basna and Gram Panchayat Gidhali have provided the required documents to petitioner but they are not certified and in some of documents, there is manipulation. He further submits that a direction may be issued to Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund and Janpad Panchayat, Basna to provide certified copies of the required documents without any manipulation. 2) On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents oppose. They submit that original certified copies would be provided to petitioner if he pays requisite fees. 3) Heard. 4) Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Rizvi, this petition is hereby being disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to make fresh application before Zila Panchayat, Mahasamund and Janpad Panchayat, Basna, who in turn are
directed to take appropriate decision and provide certified copies of the documents mentioned in the application expeditiously. 5) With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM