-1- W.P. No.24495 of 2025 Date of order:11.09.2025 APHC010482342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24495/2025 Between: Chakka Sanjana ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: -2- W.P. No.24495 of 2025 Date of order:11.09.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.24495 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in marking the petitioner’s property for acquisition and pressuring the petitioner to accept the TDR certificates in return for handing over the portion of the property for the purpose of road widening and initiating steps to dispossess the petitioner from the property without following procedure contemplated under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as arbitrary and illegal. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation. 3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025 and requested to pass a similar order in this writ petition also. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondents. -3- W.P. No.24495 of 2025 Date of order:11.09.2025 The operative portion of the said order, reads as under: “….the writ petition is disposed off directing the respondent authorities not to disturb the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s property without following due process of law, making it further clear that the respondent authorities shall have to follow the Act 30 of 13 while acquiring the land of the petitioner.” 4. In view of the same, for the reasons alike in the aforesaid order, this writ petition is also disposed of, in terms of the order, dated 08.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21175 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dt.11.09.2025 BV Note: Registry to annex a copy of the order In W.P. No.21175 of 2025