1 2025:CGHC:33279 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7151 of 2025 1 - Girdhar Gopal Dansena S/o Shri Budheshwar Prasad Dansena, Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Government Primary School Kukrijhariya, Posted On Administrative Ground At Govt Primary School Raksapali, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh, R/o Village Sondka, Tehsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, Disrict Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate Of Publice Instructtions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director, School Education Department, Bilaspur Division Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Cum President, Of The District Rationalization Committee, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Cum Member Secretary Of The District Rationalization Committee, Raigarh Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer, Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 7 - Principal / Headmaster, Government Primary School Raksapali, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 8 - Principal/ Headmaster, Government Primary School Kataipali, Block Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 9 - Head Master/ Principal, Government Primary School Kukrijhariya, Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.09.03 19:54:02 +0530 2 10 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. K. S. Saini, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 16/07/2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his/her transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation, if already not made, and in turn the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07.07.2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07.07.2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025. 3 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his/her representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07.07.2025 raising all the grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law in an objective manner by passing reasoned order as early as possible. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok