Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32628 (HP)

BHAWAN PARKASH GAUR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

EX.P./70/2025 · 2025-08-07

Bipin Chander Negi

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No.69/2025 a/w Ex. Petition Nos.70 and 75 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07th August, 2025. 1. Execution Petition No.69 of 2025 Dr. Hari Krishan Thakur .....Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Anr. …..Respondents. 2. Execution Petition No.70 of 2025 Bhawan Parkash Gaur .....Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Anr. …..Respondents. 3. Execution Petition No.75 of 2025 Vanita Dhanotia .....Petitioner. Versus State of HP & Anr. …..Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate, in all the petitions. For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Singh, Dy. Advocate General, for respondent No.1 /State in all the petitions. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2, in all the petitions. Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral). The judgment sought to be executed, in the case at hand, was decided on the basis of law laid down in CWP No.4586 of 2023, titled Tika Ram vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and another a/w connected matters. Tika Ram’s case was decided on the basis of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 judgment passed in CWP No.5651 of 2023, titled Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others. Dr. Sunil Kumar’s case was decided on the basis of judgment passed in CWP No.2108 of 2023, titled Bhagat Ram vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others. In Bhagat Ram’s case, a review petition was filed, which was allowed and the judgment passed in Bhagat Ram’s case was recalled. 2. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, learned Dy. Advocate General submits that an appropriate application for recalling of judgment dated 23.07.2024 passed in CWP No.10093 of 2023 and restoration of the writ petition to original number, which is sought to be executed, shall be filed. 3. In view of the aforesaid contention, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) does not intend to press the execution proceedings. 4. In view thereof, present petitions are disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 07th August, 2025 (Gaurav Rawat)