Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 32627 (KAR)

D P RAGHUNANDHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/51440/2019 · 2025-01-23

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2999 WP No. 51440 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51440 OF 2019 (GM-PDS) BETWEEN: SRI.D.P.RAGHUNANDHAN, S/O LATE PATTABI RAMASHETTY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/A SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE, DEVALAPURA HOBLI, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 445. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA - 571 401. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2999 WP No. 51440 of 2019 4. THE TAHASILDAR, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, NAGAMANGALA - 571 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SRINIVAS KUMAR.M., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Harsha Kumar Gowda., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Srinivas Kumar.M., HCGP for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 19.08.2019 passed by the third respondent in No.Food/Fair Price Depot/ CR/22/2019-20 vide Annexure-E. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The Suspension Order was passed by the Deputy Director, Food Civil Supplies and Consumer on 19.08.2019. The petitioner questioned the same before the Deputy Commissioner, Department of Food and Civil Supplies and - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2999 WP No. 51440 of 2019 Consumer Affairs, Mandya in Appeal No.01/2019-20. The petitioner also sought for stay of the Suspension Order. The Deputy Commissioner vide order dated 17.09.2019 granted interim order. However, on 22.11.2019 the interim order was not extended. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. The order sheet of the proceedings before the Deputy Commissioner is furnished along with the Writ Petition and the same is marked as Annexure-J. A careful perusal of the same reflects that the Deputy Commissioner has not extended the interim order. Suffice it to note that this Court vide order dated 29.11.2019 had stayed the suspension order. Since the appeal is pending before the Deputy Commissioner, this Court deems it proper to quash the order dated 22.11.2019. Accordingly, it is quashed. The interim order granted by this Court shall continue to operate till the disposal of the appeal by the Deputy Commissioner. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 39