Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3262 (GAU)

BIKASH DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/4192/2025 · 2026-05-14

Michael Zothankhuma, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010259162025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4192/2025 BIKASH DAS S/O- LATE TARAPADA DAS,RESIDENT OF - WARD NO.9, NETAJINAGAR, PAL PARA, BONGAIGAON,ASSAM, PIN NO.- 783380. DISTRICT BONGAIGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTEDBY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM, EDUCATIONSECONDARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR,GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BONGAIGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE BONGAIGAON DIST- BONGAIGAON. 4:ABDUR REZZAQUE M.A. B.ED. SUBJECT TEACHER OF VIVEKANANDAVIDYAPITH HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL DISTRICT BONGAIGAON PIN NO.783381 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DAS, MR D BARMAN Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N J KHATANIAR, SC, DEPTT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, Linked Case : CRP/0/0 BIKASH DAS S/O- LATE TARAPADA DAS RESIDENTOF - WARD NO.9 NETAJI NAGAR PALPARA BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN NO.-783380. DISTRICT- BONGAIGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BYTHE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OFASSAM EDUCATION SECONDARYDEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19. 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BONGAIGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE BONGAIGAON DIST- BONGAIGAON. 4:ABDUR REZZAQUE M.A. B.ED. SUBJECT TEACHER OF VIVEKANANDAVIDYAPITH HIGHER SECONDARYSCHOOL DISTRICT BONGAIGAON PINNO.783381. ------------ Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for : SANTANU KUMAR DAS Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 15/05/2026 (Michael Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. S.K. Das, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 125 days in preferring the appeal. Ms. R. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondents submits that she has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. The delay is accordingly condoned. Registry to register the appeal and the matter for admission. IA is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant