APHC010015092025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 855/2025 Between: A.Yedukondalu The State of AP and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P Narasimhulu Counsel for the Respondents: 1. GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development The Court made the following: ORDER:- Challenging the action of the 2 against the 3rd respondent the road situated at the western side of the petitioner’s property of 204.4 Square Yards located in Corporation Area, Guntur City, the instant writ petition is filed. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 855/2025 AND The State of AP and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development The Court made the following: Challenging the action of the 2nd respondent in not initiating any action respondent in raising the unauthorized construction in midst of road situated at the western side of the petitioner’s property of 204.4 Square Yards located in Sy. No.85/B at Gorantla, Guntur Municipal Corporation Area, Guntur City, the instant writ petition is filed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...Petitioner ...Respondents respondent in not initiating any action construction in midst of road situated at the western side of the petitioner’s property of 204.4 Sy. No.85/B at Gorantla, Guntur Municipal 2 2. Heard Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel placed on record a copy of the written instructions received from the 2nd respondent-Municipal Corporation, stating that the Corporation had already issued a notice to the unofficial respondent on 04.01.2025, to stop the unauthorized construction, and a show-cause notice had also been issued to the unofficial respondents. It also reflects that the unofficial respondent had also submitted an explanation dated 06.01.2025, stating that the construction had been immediately stopped and that on northern side of his plot, a 30-feet road is existing, and he has not constructed any building on the road. It is further noted from the written instructions that the Corporation had already circulated the file to conduct a survey into the allegations of the petitioner. The said instructions further reveals that appropriate action would be taken after receiving of the survey report. 4. The written instructions of the respondent No.2 are placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to take appropriate action in the matter as expeditiously as possible, after hearing 3 both the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, within two (2) months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 10.01.2025 BSK 4 35 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 855/2025 Date: 10.01.2025 BSK